On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Consider the case of an existing (1.3) module that uses
> ap_r*. The author's goal is to do as little as possible
> to make it work under 2.0. It sounds as though the OLD_WRITE
> solution will do this; he can leave all his content-related
> calls along, and just upgrade the hooks. The macro option
> requires him to learn about bucket brigades.
>
> Is that correct?
No. Either way, the old ap_r* calls always work. The module author only
needs to re-learn anything if they WANT to use the direct bucket calls.
If they stick with just ap_r*, there is nothing new in either model.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
