Isn't 2.0 already using PCRE?  ISTR that we added PCRE at an early stage...

david


> In 2.0, that is.
> 
> At 23:16 3.3. 2001, Cynic wrote the following:
> -------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >It seems like the regexp library used in 1.3 doesn't know 
> >assertions. Was it discussed to used something more powerful?
> >PCRE comes to mind...


Reply via email to