On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Does anyone consider this response acceptable?
>
> 127.0.0.1 - - [05/Mar/2001:09:49:11 -0600] "HEAD
>/manual/misleading-insulting-statement/../suexec.html HTTP/1.0" 200 0
[...]
>
> I'm thinking FilesystemOptions [[+|-]EtagInode] [[+|-]CanonicalRedirect]
>
I'm a little skeptical about programming all these redirects into
Apache. I agree that having "one true URL" for each resource is the way
to go, but unless there is a security or basic usability issue, I think
it is best to keep this as transparent as possible. For example,
why not just include the following in the default httpd.conf:
