From: "Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:39 AM > Although I'm no protocol expert, my reading of rfc2068 leads me to believe > that such a request header would be used to indicate that the request body > is chunked, not that it can accept/wants a chunked response. Follow RFC2616 (and RFC2817) as the current http (and http/tls) specification. [The later interests me the most ... mass vhosted ip-less SSL? Cool :-]
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 sendrecv.c Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 sendrecv.c Brian Havard
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 sendrecv.... Greg Ames
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 sendr... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 s... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/... Paul J. Reder
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: apr/net... Brian Havard
- Re: cvs commit: apr/net... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: apr/net... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: apr/net... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: apr/net... Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: apr/net... rbb
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 sendr... Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/os2 sendrecv.... rbb
