On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Greg Ames wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > I really think this is a showstopper for 2.0 - unless folks can test > > > the server feeding characters at a time, we are broken. I see no problem > > > with setting a timeout for the complete request to be assembled (to avoid > > > DNS attacks) but the current situation seems pretty intollerable. > > > > > > I was just closing a bugreport that required me to check the contenttype > > > of a file, so I tried telnet to HEAD that file, and it pretends I don't > > > exist (no response.) It took me 1/2 hour to remember this bug. > > > > > > Did someone start working out the fix? > > > > This did work at one time. I tested this VERY extensively using my one > > Windows 98 machine. If it no longer works, then it is because somebody > > modified the input filters. I know that it did work at one time. > > > > I tested it a bunch too, back when we were working on input filtering, > ap_getline(), and the mime header folding stuff. I tried it again just > now, and it works fine for me. I used telnet from WinNT 4. I originally tested with telnet from Win98, and this weekend, I forced my Linux telnet into char-at-a-time mode, and ran a few simple tests, and it seemed to work. I was trying to replicate the assertion failure, but couldn't. I didn't pay much attention to this bug, but the fact that the char-at-a-time worked for my testing is a good thing. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
