On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:46:25PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >... > So I"m strongly -1 from removing this module under those two points. You could > probably add other arguments for keeping/removing the module, but I think these > two are the only relevant arguments for keeping it in the core. > > Consider this a veto until further convincing arguments are presented. -1 is always a veto when talking about the code. People who want to "vote" against something should use -0 if they don't like it. Additional comments or -0.5 or something can express how much they dislike it. But -1 should stick to being a veto so that we don't have to keep clarifying what the hell a -1 means. -1 is a veto. Use something else to express dislike. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
- Let's remove some modules from Apache 2.0 Bill Stoddard
- Re: Let's remove some modules from Apache 2.0 Greg Marr
- Re: Let's remove some modules from Apache 2.... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Let's remove some modules from Apach... rbb
- Re: Let's remove some modules from A... Jim Winstead
- Re: Let's remove some modules from Apach... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Let's remove some modules from A... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Let's remove some modules f... Cliff Woolley
- Re: Let's remove some modules from A... Cliff Woolley
- Re: Let's remove some modules from A... Greg Stein
- Re: Let's remove some modules f... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Let's remove some modul... Cliff Woolley
- Re: Let's remove some m... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Let's remove some m... Cliff Woolley
- Re: Let's remove some modules f... Cliff Woolley
- Re: Let's remove some modules from A... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Let's remove some modules f... Jim Winstead
- Re: Let's remove some modul... rbb
- Re: Let's remove some m... rbb
- Re: Let's remove some m... Ben Laurie
