[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The example code you were working with was a very rough example. Chuck
> and I wrote it in a fwe weeks, and it was ugly and almost impossible to
> follow. It made a lot of assumptions that it shouldn't have made, just
> because we wanted to see if it would work.
Hey - it worked :)
> A comment seems to make sense. Why don't you post a patch with a comment,
> and I will commit it.
Will do.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- [PATCH] bugfix in http_filter() Graham Leggett
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix in http_filter() rbb
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix in http_filter() Graham Leggett
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix in http_filter() rbb
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix in http_filter() Graham Leggett
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix in http_filter() rbb
- No processes left after big AB te... Graham Leggett
- No processes left after big A... Austin Gonyou
- Re: No processes left after b... Bill Stoddard
- Re: No processes left after b... rbb
- Re: No processes left after b... Paul J. Reder
- Re: No processes left after b... Greg Ames
- Re: No processes left after b... Paul J. Reder
- Re: No processes left after b... Bill Stoddard
- Re: No processes left after b... Greg Ames
- Re: No processes left after b... rbb
- Re: [PATCH] bugfix in http_fi... Graham Leggett
