On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Why don't we just use the bugzilla that is on that Sun machine? isn't it
> > called nagoya.apache.org, or something like that?
>
> 1. we tried bugzilla before for 2.x bug reports. result: it was used as
> one step in a root compromise. Sure, having it on its own box helps
> things out. But doesn't remove the concern.
> 2. bugzilla doesn't, out of the box, provide some of the functionality
> that we have now that I consider to be quite important.
> 3. even if those weren't issues, it has to be configured and setup in a
> way that lets it meet our needs and people have to know how it should be
> used.
>
> While I am unhappily resigned to the fact that bugzilla may, in fact, form
> the core of what the best solution is for us, I don't know that it is just
> a drop-it-in-and-run thing.
Nagoya was setup specifically to be a bugzilla machine for the ASF. It is
run by Pier and somebody else, who I can't remember. The root compromise
is not a big issue, because that machine doesn't really run anything other
than bugzilla.
I do realize that there are some features that bugzilla doesn't have, but
what other piece of software does, other than GNATS? Can we add them to
bugzilla?
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
