Re: [PATCH] mpm_query

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:39 PM


> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Sander van Zoest wrote:
> 
> > The more accurate information you have in the noc the better. Why monitor
> > if you do not know what you are monitoring?
> 
> The problem is that the MPM name is not accurate.  We have a habit of
> changing names of things.  The MPM properties are the best way to
> determine the behavior of the MPM IMNSHO.

100% correct that we need to test features (dynamically), not the arbitrary
name of some MPM.

Beyond that, there is nothing wrong with being informative :-)