Bill Stoddard wrote: > > > > > AFAIK, Paul hit this problem because of idle_server_maintenance and/or > > MaxRequestsPerChild - true? If that's really the extent of it, I > > believe there's a pretty easy solution. > > > > If you buy that, then why doesn't that solution work for > > MaxRequestsPerChild as well? > > True (IMHO). > > > For the low end folks it's probably the default anyway, which we > > developers just pulled out of the air. So if we have our mixed workload > > process basket case scenario going on, just hold off on killing any more > > processes until the first one terminates completely. > > Show us some code :-) > OK, it's committed...works swell for me. Paul? Greg
- Suggested direction for fixing threaded mpm thread st... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threaded mpm ... rbb
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threaded ... Chuck Murcko
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threaded ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threa... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threa... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threaded mpm ... Greg Ames
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threaded ... Jeff Trawick
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threaded ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing threa... Greg Ames
- Re: Suggested direction for fixing t... rbb
- Re: Suggested direction for fix... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Suggested direction for... rbb
- Re: Suggested direction... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Suggested direction... rbb
- Re: Suggested direction... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Suggested direction... Paul J. Reder
- Re: Suggested direction... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Suggested direction for fix... Greg Ames
