Isn't mod_tls a prerequisit for mod_ssl? Why would they be independent? In
other words, why would a user have mod_tls without mod_ssl? And why would
somebody have mod_ssl without mod_tls?
I'm thinking *both* modules would key off the --with-ssl and/or --enable-ssl
switches.
Cheers,
-g
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 07:58:16AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rse 01/05/05 00:58:16
>
> Modified: modules/tls config.m4
> Log:
> Allow mod_tls and mod_ssl coexists without interfering each other by
> renaming the --with-ssl option of mod_tls to --with-tls. This way we can
> use --enable-ssl/--with-ssl for mod_ssl and --enable-tls/--with-tls for
> mod_tls.
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.6 +3 -3 httpd-2.0/modules/tls/config.m4
>
> Index: config.m4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/tls/config.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
> --- config.m4 2001/04/29 05:24:10 1.5
> +++ config.m4 2001/05/05 07:58:15 1.6
> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
> -AC_MSG_CHECKING(for SSL library)
> +AC_MSG_CHECKING(for TLS/SSL support)
> APACHE_MODPATH_INIT(tls)
>
> tls_objs="mod_tls.lo openssl_state_machine.lo"
>
> APACHE_MODULE(tls, TLS/SSL support, $tls_objs, , no, [
> - AC_ARG_WITH(ssl, [ --with-ssl use a specific SSL library installation ],
> + AC_ARG_WITH(tls, [ --with-tls=DIR use a specific TLS/SSL library],
> [
> searchfile="$withval/inc/ssl.h"
> if test -f $searchfile ; then
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> fi
> AC_MSG_RESULT(found $ssl_lib)
> ],[
> - AC_MSG_ERROR(--with-ssl not given)
> + AC_MSG_ERROR(--with-tls not given)
> ] ) ] )
>
> APACHE_MODPATH_FINISH
>
>
>
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
