On Thu, 10 May 2001 11:41:39 -0400 (EDT), Jim Jagielski wrote:
>Brian Havard wrote:
>> >We could
>> >first check for implementations that use macros and then true
>> >functions. Despite the nasty error (which I'm unsure why we're
>> >seeing... such messages should be going to /dev/null) does
>> >the build process completely die?
>>
>> It still builds fine, it just doesn't define HAVE_ISNAN even though we do
>> have it. Just how important an impact that has, I have no idea. AFAIK
>> nothing in Apache uses ap_snprintf to print a float.
>>
>
>For now, let's just override it in the correct *.h file (ala what
>OtherBill just did for Win32). A false positive is worse, in
>this case, than a false negative.
Suits me. Commiting now....
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah! |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------