I thought the consensus is to roll in the known-stable proxy back
into httpd-2.0/modules/proxy. Little sense in keeping three trees.
Did I miss something?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Apache Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Apache rollup tree
> Hi all,
>
> After the whole integrate-mod-proxy discussion died down, much was
> suggested about a rolldown tree where the latest stable version of a
> module was available when an RM wanted to make a release of Apache. This
> would require two steps:
>
> - the mod_proxy people (us) would need to create a directory underneath
> the proxy CVS tree to contain the most recent stable known-to-work
> release of the module (eg. proxy/stable). (This directory would at the
> moment be empty until our showstopper bugs are fixed).
>
> - the how-to-roll-Apache page would need to be updated to include
> instructions on where to pull this proxy code, and where to place it in
> the release directory structure (modules/proxy). (In time, other modules
> would need to go through the same procedure, if this gets out of hand,
> we can automate it).
>
> I can do the first bit, votes for the second?
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
> -----------------------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
> over Bourbon Street
> tonight..."
>
>
>
