I'm satisfied that David McCreedy, Brian Havard, Brad Nicholes and I have
isnan/isfnf sorted out on the obscure platforms, and JimJag's patch for
unicies appears to be significatly robust. Of course, testing the tarball
is the most efficient way for everyone to be certain.
I'm proceeding to back out the ab comments, tag prior to the ab improvements,
retag the comments for 1.3.20, and leave that code in it's current state.
Tag and roll coming up here in the next 20 minutes or so.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Proposed Code Freeze for 1.3.20
> If at any time progress is stopped because someone committed a bad
> patch to the tree, the best way to fix it is to revert the patch
> (unless for some reason that patch is necessary for the release).
> I'd say you can revert all of the changes for isnan and ab if you
> are in a hurry to get this release out.
>
> People just shouldn't be committing stuff like that to 1.3.x.
>
> ....Roy
>
>
