On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> (maybe this should read "still broken"?)
>
> Why are we still using signals sent to the children in the
> non-graceful restart case? That doesn't interrupt select or mutex
> acquire, as described previously.
>
> ap_mpm_pod_signal() seems to be busted anyway. We loop writing to the
> pod (why loop?) until it fails due to pipe full, then we bail out
> without waking up the child via connect().
>
> Working on it... just wondering if there is a reason why non-graceful
> shouldn't call ap_mpm_pod_signal() too...
Using the pod can't do non-graceful. The point of non-graceful, is that
it is immediate. If all of your threads are currently serving requests,
then sending data to the pod won't do anything until at least one request
is done.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
