Clere Jean-Frederic FSC EP LP COM 5 wrote:
>
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > >> Strange,
> > >>
> > >> I didn't have that, libtool use mod_jk.la :
> > >>
> > >> make -f Makefile.linux
> > >>
> > >> /usr/sbin/apxs2 -DUSE_APACHE_MD5 -I ../common -I
> > >/opt/IBMJava2-13/include -I
> > >> /opt/IBMJava2-13/include/linux -c -o mod_jk.la mod_jk.c
> > >
> > >mod_jk.la that why I am complaining!
> > >Should not we able to use mod_jk.so directly?
> >
> > Yes it seems there is something bad here.
> > I tried many things before using .la.
> >
> > Do you see what to fix in apxs ?
>
> Yes, I will propose a patch soon...
>
> >
> > >apxs of Apache-1.3 does it that way.
> >
> > Yes, so we need to fix apxs ?
Here is the patch:
+++
Index: apxs.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apache/httpd-2.0/support/apxs.in,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 apxs.in
--- apxs.in 2001/05/18 19:34:48 1.20
+++ apxs.in 2001/06/11 17:11:22
@@ -350,11 +350,13 @@
$dso_file =~ s|\.[^.]+$|.la|;
}
else {
- $dso_file = "mod_unknown.so";
+ $dso_file = "mod_unknown.la";
}
}
else {
+ # libtool only knows about .la files (no .so or .dll).
$dso_file = $opt_o;
+ $dso_file =~ s|\.[^.]+$|.la|;
}
# create compilation commands
+++
The apxs description programs/apxs.html needs a update:
- the outputs are from Apache-1.3 should be from Apache-2.0
- dsofile is mod_name.la not mod_name.so
- should we explain that the "real" dynamic library is located in .libs and that
it should be installed by using apxs -i mod_name.la?
Should we tell (by print for example) the apxs silently correct the object name?
Please check the patch and commit it.
Cheers
Jean-frederic
