Re: [PATCH] screw up prefork even more

[Greg Ames]

Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 

> With this patch, SIGWINCH and SIGHUP basically work for me on a
> particular machine :)

Great!  This sounds like progress.

> 
> a couple of "issues" I have noted:
> 
> . occasionally after restart we get more server processes than we
>   need, and this then gets lowered to the number specified by
>   MaxSpareServers
> 

could this be a combination of old generation and new generation
processes right after the restart?

Greg