Greg Stein wrote:
> Discussion is never "closed" on any of the code. If you have a better way,
> then we can continue discussing. But I have to say, I believe the hook is
> the absolute right answer (it frees all endpoints from knowing about the
> others), and I think human-recognizable strings for names is appropriate. I
> also liked the set of types available for each item (integer, string, or a
> (sub) hash table)
XML!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
