Re: plz vote on tagging current CVS as APACHE_2_0_19

[rbb]

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> > They have configured their system for the general case.  We are talking
> > about the edge case here.  The user has asked for 10 processes with 25
> > threads each.  What they are saying, is I want 250 threads.  If we are
> > all of a sudden under heavy load, then we have to give them 250 threads,
> > 227 isn't good enough.
>
> The process/thread allocation system is supposed to be adaptive to server
> load -- its goal is to keep the server going as well as possible.  There is
> no way to do that and insist on a specific number of threads on every graceful
> restart.  That isn't what a graceful restart means.  In fact, we should
> not be generating more than (max threads - current threads) regardless of
> whether those threads are old or new server instances.

Yes, we can't create more than a total of max threads, but my point is we
shouldn't be allocating less either.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------