I'm going to review all of this as soon as I go home.  Could be a few
hours before I get to this.  Bear with me.

Ryan

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:32 PM
>
>
> > Folks,
> >
> >   first, would some else verify that autoindex and negotiation now work properly
> > from cvs/head in Apache 2.0?  Also, would someone else comment on my observation
> > below?  Once those are gone, I'm all for tagging 2.0.19.
>
> Any takers?
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:30 PM
> > Subject: Fw: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server request.c
> >
> >
> > > >   --- request.c 2001/06/27 20:44:00 1.9
> > > >   +++ request.c 2001/06/27 20:46:52 1.10
> > > >   +    fill_in_sub_req_vars(rnew, r, next_filter);
> > > >
> > > >        rnew->per_dir_config = r->server->lookup_defaults;
> > >
> > > This assignment only occured in ap_sub_req_method_uri(), shouldn't this
> > > also occur for ap_sub_req_lookup_file/dirent() ???
>
> This has been so since fielding's 1.1, and it's cool... we choose one of two flavors
> of initializing rnew->per_dir_config later on in apr_sub_req_lookup_file and we take
> that alternate tact for apr_sub_req_lookup_dirent.  No problem here.
>
>
> > > >   +    fill_in_sub_req_vars(rnew, r, next_filter);
> > > >
> > > >        rnew->chunked        = r->chunked;
> > >
> > > This assignment only occured in ap_sub_req_lookup_file(), shouldn't it
> > > also occur for ap_sub_req_method_uri?!?
>
> rbb ... this is you, http_request.c 1.16;
> Fix some remaining problems with SSI's and Windows.  Basically, the
> sendfile stuff doesn't work properly with chuncked data.
> Submitted by: Allan Edwards
> Reviewed by:  Ryan Bloom
>
>
>


_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to