On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Dale Ghent wrote:

> > That seems to work fine on HP-UX 11.0..  I'll get back on the
> > results on IPF (or IA64).
>
> That did the trick on Solaris 8, as well.

Same here.  I haven't taken much time to look at yesterday's change to
threaded.c, but this suggested fix doesn't quite "feel" right to me.  If
we test the number of idle threads against maxspare*maxdaemons, doesn't
that mean that we can have way more idle threads per process available
than we should if we have less than the max number of daemons running
currently?  Also, there's a test that follows that which checks the
number of idle threads against minspare... something needs to get done to
that too, I'm guessing.

I will have to take more time to absorb these latest changes...

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Charlottesville, VA


Reply via email to