On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:36:10PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> OTOH, it seems the new sms code just needs a whack upside the head to
> stop it from asking for extra memory from its parent.
*cackle*.
just got in, saw a whole boat-load of messages about sms [grief,
who'd have thought it, neh? :) will get to them in a bit].
i saw the profiling: a suggestion - why not make a less-trivial
sms that uses a hash-table? i mean, the trivial sms proves
the point, and people can now go 'oh yeah, it works!' [and,
'what was all the darn fuss about???']. 'now, how do we make
it better, little-step-by-little-step'?
sander, did you do sma as an sms yet (sma: smart memory allocator),
to do a comparison?
luke
