On Tuesday 10 July 2001 00:59, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> Then do a graceful restart.
> You can see the server shifting itself around as the new processes come up
> and the old ones go down... but for some reason three workers with
> generations 3, 4, and 5 respectively get left behind, one per "line" in
> the server-status output (whatever that means),
Once upon a time, all the threads for a given process were displayed on a
single line if possible. ISTR the leftmost position on the line was unused,
possibly to reserve space for process status.
Greg
