On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This seems like an extremely complex way to implement this. The following
> patch allows a binary compiled on FreeBSD with ACCEPTFILTERs to work on
> FreeBSD's without them. My own preference is to remove the new directive,
> because we will need to support it in 2.0 as well.
> + && errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOPROTOOPT) {
This is *also* a good improvement; but as Dean said (and I found to my
chagarin) on some machine; though they do support SO_ACCEPTFILTER you
want to be able to switch it off has it wedges with certain kernels.
Hence the need to ALSO switch it off.
Dw.
