On Wednesday, July 18, 2001, at 03:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> What's the point? Is it not working for you somewhere? I suspect you
> really mean something like
>
> Gee whiz, I'm having trouble using the dechunk filter in XXX because
> YYY. I think that if I changed it to do ZZZ then it would work for
> XXX as well as for the normal path.
>
>
Kind of, but the comment
/* ### woah... ap_http_filter() is doing this, too */
from ap_dechunk_filter() gives me pause that the problem is bigger than
one filter.
Is general input filter policy to strip eos buckets and append its own?
Or does this vary by filter? I'm wondering how to know when I'm done
ap_get_brigade'ing. Checking for eos is apparently not the correct
answer. Just wondering if it should be.
Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/
