On Thursday 19 July 2001 11:35, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:00 PM
>
> > Yep. The inherit flag only affects apr_create_process. Since we
> > create child processes with fork, the inherit flag has no affect.
> > Basically, the inherit flag will not be able to affect fork()
> > until fork() becomes a real part of APR, which means somebody
> > needs to implement it on Windows. :-)
>
> apr_status_t apr_fork(...)
> {
> return APR_ENOTIMPL;
> }
That's what it does now. However, this doesn't really solve the
problem. :-)
Ryan
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- daedalus is back on 2.0.21-dev Greg Ames
- Re: daedalus is back on 2.0.21-dev Greg Ames
- Re: daedalus is back on 2.0.21-dev Cliff Woolley
- Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus is back on 2.0.2... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus is back ... Greg Ames
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus is b... Ryan Bloom
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daed... Ryan Bloom
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus is b... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus... Greg Ames
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daed... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daedalus... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daed... Justin Erenkrantz
- Pool allocation bottlenecks... Brian Pane
- Re: Tag 2.0.21 was Re: daed... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: daedalus is back on 2.0.21-dev Gonyou, Austin
- Re: daedalus is back on 2.0.21-dev Justin Erenkrantz
