On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 04:39:26PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I just started looking at APR to see what to change but I don't see a > problem. > > I just played on Solaris 8... I don't see a problem there. Aha! I'm seeing ret being equivalent to 20507 which looks to be APR_ETIMEUP. Oh dear, don't we need to check if the return value is APR_ETIMEUP? -- justin
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Jeff Trawick
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Jeff Trawick
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Jeff Trawick
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Jeff Trawick
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Jeff Trawick
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Fix POD reading... Jeff Trawick
