+1 in concept/.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:50 PM
Subject: backporting runtime serialized accept directive to 1.3
> I have a patch that implements the "backport" of making serialize
> accepts a runtime parameter. I don't consider the 1.3 tree a "dead"
> one, and agree that:
>
> 1. Intensive development on 1.3 is discouraged
> 2. And new features added to 1.3 should only be done if ported
> also to 2.0
>
> Yet, I think that this addition (yes, OK, *feature*) makes sense.
> Anyone going to shoot me down?
> --
> ===========================================================================
> Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
> "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
> will lose both and deserve neither"
>
