On Tuesday 24 July 2001 22:45, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Good point. And folks, this is a 2.0.22-dev showstopper :(
>
> Ryan, you invented both constructs. Thoughts?
First, apr_file_set_inherit isn't in the exports file, because we explicitly don't put
it there.
The problem is that the function only exists when a macro is evaluated, so if we use
the
awk script, then we try to create a line like:
void *ap_hack_apr_set_##type##_inherit = apr_set_##name##_inherit
This is obviosly wrong. No amount of mucking with APR_DECLARE_* will resolve this.
I guess I am having a hard time seeing any way to resolve this problem.
Ryan
>
> Bill
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Apache Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:43 PM
> Subject: make_exports.awk vs APR_DECLARE_* macros
>
> > A problem I have with the current code is that apr_file_set_inherit()
> > isn't included in the exports list because its declaration isn't of the
> > usual form. We need to either make make_exports.awk aware of the various
> > APR_DECLARE_* macros or ditch them altogether & declare them normally. I
> > vote the latter, we write the standard form in the comment above it
> > anyway...
> >
> > --
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________________
> >_____
> >
> > | Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah!
> > | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life
> > | of Brian |
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-----
--
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
