"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > ... is broken, and I suspect one generation or another of the inherit fooness. > > Greg, what are you seeing? Was this the latest inherit fix or an earlier iteration? Let me check it out. We are/were running a build I put up about 10 pm EDT, from CVS late yesterday. There are lots of ways to screw up the suexec, but I thought it was working last nite. Greg
- http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a 500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a 500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a 500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a ... Joshua Slive
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives u... Joshua Slive
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a ... Cliff Woolley
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a 500 Greg Ames
- Re: http://bugs.apache.org/ gives us a 500 Greg Ames
- CGI showstopper: Re: http://bugs.apache.org/... Cliff Woolley
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: http://bugs.apa... Brian Pane
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: http://bugs.apa... Greg Ames
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: http://bugs... Cliff Woolley
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: http:/... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: ht... Cliff Woolley
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: http://bugs... Marc Slemko
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: http:/... Greg Ames
- Re: CGI showstopper: Re: ht... Cliff Woolley
