From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:00 PM
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:32 PM
>
>
> > We might trip over this one at some point, so I figured it is worth
> > placing in the archive.
>
> Bill Stoddard's efforts have been in exactly the _opposite_ direction :-)
> Our aim is to reuse the socket, rather than a fast-disconnect and close.
I stand corrected... we do accept the APR_SENDFILE_DISCONNECT_SOCKET option,
and we do slam that closed on c->keepalive in the core. Actually, we go a
step further and TF_REUSE_SOCKET, which is sort of known not to really be
well supported.
