That is something I noticed with 2.0.6, but now were 16 revisions shy. I
might look at this as well, if I can get the time. I hope I can.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 1:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] threaded.c and apr_thread_create() failures
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 01:22:52PM -0500, Gonyou, Austin wrote:
> > The question is getting whupped doing what? You can seldom
> define true
> > performance of an application, if they do not do what they
> are intended to
> > do. At this point, I think static service is the best
> check, versus anything
> > dymanmic what so ever.
>
> Static content - no dynamic content whatsoever.
>
> Both prefork and threaded MPM - I'd have thought that prefork would
> match Apache 1.3, but we're not even in the same ballpark as 1.3.
> Yuck.
>
> I need to examine why this is the case. I'll give more details when
> I can collect them (early next week). -- justin
>
