----- Original Message ----- From: "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: RE: tarballs are up > This is the only seriously negative feedback I've gotten so far on 2.0.22. > If it's true, then it's a problem, yes, but what are people's feelings > about its severity? I personally don't consider it a showstopper, though > it's worth a cautionary note in the announcement... something along the > lines of the note below. Thoughts? > > Here is the current list of known issues. Have I missed anything? Beauty... only thing I'd say is... > Known issues with 2.0.22: > > 1) Win9x and WinME do not yet work correctly s/correctly/at all/ :) Ready for the big-B?
- Re: tarballs are up Greg Ames
- RE: tarballs are up Gonyou, Austin
- RE: tarballs are up Gonyou, Austin
- RE: tarballs are up MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
- RE: tarballs are up Padwa, Daniel
- RE: tarballs are up GUMMALAM,MOHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex2)
- Re: tarballs are up Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: tarballs are up Ryan Bloom
- RE: tarballs are up Cliff Woolley
- RE: tarballs are up Cliff Woolley
- Re: tarballs are up William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: tarballs are up Cliff Woolley
- Re: tarballs are... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: tarballs are up Greg Ames
- Re: tarballs are up Cliff Woolley
- Re: tarballs are up Cliff Woolley
- Re: tarballs are... Greg Ames
- Re: tarball... Cliff Woolley
- Re: tar... Cliff Woolley
- Re: tar... Greg Ames
- Re: tar... Cliff Woolley
