yep, beos is fine and serving nicely...
Tweak to the SSL code after the roll, but that's not a stopper.
Does that mean we have beta 2????
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: tarballs are up
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:30:10 -0400 (EDT), Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> >On 30 Jul 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >> > I just posted the 2.0.22 tarballs at dev.apache.org/dist. Check 'em
out.
> >>
> >> +1 for beta
> >
> >Cooooollll... that's enough +1's for beta (OtherBill, Jeff, myself, and
> >Justin). That would seem to cover at least Win32 and a few flavors of
> >Unix (at least Linux and Solaris). I'll wait a little while longer for
> >confirmation from a few other platforms, and then go with it. =-)
> >
> >Brian, David, how are OS/2 and BeOS looking?
>
> Working on OS/2 as far as my minimal testing goes (builds, serves a few
> pages).
>
> --
>
____________________________________________________________________________
__
> | Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah!
|
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of
Brian |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>
