Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like there might be a problem with _un_graceful restarts on
> threaded, namely that the whole server just vaporizes. It doesn't do a
> clean shutdown because the pidfile is left behind, but it's gone
> nevertheless. I've yet to find evidence of a segfault happening, but that
> remains a possibility. I just checked and it works fine on prefork (as
> expected). Will investigate further tomorrow.
Greg Ames and I have been playing with this. See a patch I just
committed to mod_cgid. [Apparently] since 8/6/2001 when dougm fixed a
leak problem, ungraceful restart was segfaulting in the parent
process. If you retag this as 2.0.23 just wipe the CHANGES entry
since the problem appeared and went away in 2.0.23.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 ... Jerry Baker
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.... Doug MacEachern
- Re: Currently known issues wit... Jerry Baker
- Re: Currently known issues wit... Doug MacEachern
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 (very few! :... Ryan Bloom
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Cliff Woolley
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Greg Ames
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Greg Ames
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Greg Ames
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Jeff Trawick
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Jeff Trawick
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Greg Ames
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Jeff Trawick
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 (very few! :) Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 (very few! :) Ryan Bloom
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Cliff Woolley
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Ryan Bloom
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Ian Holsman
- Re: Currently known issues with 2.0.23 Cliff Woolley
