RE: are we ready to roll? - POST thru' mod_ssl

[MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)]

Another observation : shouldn't we ought to be checking the return value of
apr_brigade_partition (line 682, http_protocol.c)

Thanks
-Madhu

-----Original Message-----
From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:09 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: are we ready to roll? - POST thru' mod_ssl


Hi,
        Some thoughts towards resolving the issue :
-> Observation 1 : http_protocol.c @ line 683 => should we not check the
return value of apr_brigade_length()..
-> Observation 2 : http_protocol.c @ line 684 => During a SSL connection,
the value of total is some huge negative number (-2145909483).. I'm not sure
what that number is, but I'm certainly not comfortable with that number..
Incase of a http connection, the value is equal to *readbytes..
-> Observation 3 : if we replace lines 680 - 684 of http_protocol.c, with
the old logic, the POST seems to work for SSL connections also..

Thanks
-Madhu


-----Original Message-----
From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:51 PM
To: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Subject: RE: are we ready to roll?


On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:

> Doug,
> Is a simple POST operation through a SSL connection working ?.. It's
failing
> for me..

no, its not working since the changes rbb made to ap_http_filter
yesterday.  he's aware of the problem, but was out of the office today.
i'm going to make sure it gets fixed by tommorrow.