Martin Kraemer wrote:
>
> Great!!!! Yet untested, but that's something I always wanted.
> One thing: in the test/ directory, we have the time-sem.c
> tool which also has
> -DUSE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT -DNO_SEM_UNDO
> The NO_SEM_UNDO is a very important parameter on SVR4, without it
> you will quickly hit a system-defined (tuneable but usually low,
> around 60) limit of maximum undo structures in the kernel.
Do you know what NO_SEM_UNDO does? It sounds like it simply bypasses
the UNDO capability for semaphores.
> Could it be added to the patch?
Assuming we understand it better, +1 :)
>
> > + accept_mutex_init_fptr = &accept_mutex_init_flock;
>
> In ansi C you don't need the '&' to make a function pointer.
>
;)
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither"
