Hello!

On 2002.06.25, at 22:43, robin wrote:

> Franki wrote:
>
>> Don't laugh.. it might be a good thing if they bring this in..
>>
>> Then you'll have Palladium users, and the rest of the world..
>>
>> Sorta like the "microsoft network" when it first started..
>> they wanted their own internet, unfortunatly noone else did.
>>
>> besides.. they'd end up in court again so quickly...
>>
> True - it's tempting to be overawed by the MS Empire, but we should 
> remember their "revolutionary" projects which went belly-up almost 
> immediately: MSN, active desktops, Windows ME ....  MS relies on its 
> being a de facto standard (as opposed to a real standard): people want 
> to exchange Word documents, share data with Access, share viruses with 
> Outlook and so on. Splitting that "community" by creating a new 
> "standard" would remove Microsoft's only advantage.

Not necessarily.
I guess if they build a Mac-like close environment, and also sell the 
hardware, they have
many advantages:
- They cannot be accused anymore of monopoly practices (1) because they 
build software
for their own hardware.
- Of course, they will ensure backward compatibility with formats like 
word, powerpoint, excel,
etc. And build the corresponding software tools, so it will make sense 
for business.
- As they have a huge market share, they can build very cheap hardware 
which will be hard
to compete with (therefore get it build in China, put a MS stamp on it 
and sell it, like Mac does).
- They will also build IE and Outlook products with an option "secure 
mail only". This way,
they ensure backwards compatibility with existing mail, but because 
people get fed up with
spam, the move towards secure mail will be done.

You're talking of a new standard? yes, they will. With the well known 
"embrace and improve"
technique. At the beginning, it is not a standard, or it is the standard 
plus a little more. After 2 years,
since most of the computers are equipped, move to the nonstandard stuff 
(secure mail) and
you lock everybody else out.

One thing is sure: they have been thinking (spending thousands of 
man-month study)
  about it and you cannot judge the eventual effect just because you 
spent 5 minutes reading
an article or a mail about it.

And one of the basic rules of "the art of war" (Tun Tzu): never 
underestimate your enemy.
Especially if your enemy is 9 times stronger than you (in a 90% windows 
world).

(1) I mean the practices that aim to put exclusively MS products on OEM 
hard.
They can still be accused of monopolistic practices by keeping their 
data format secret.

Pascal


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to