Maybe you missed this message, so I post it again. My question was: gnome 2 and kde 3 are slower than their predecessor? (gnome 1.4 and kde 2.2.2). If yes, how much? has anyone used them on a 350-400 mhz machine? are them suitable for such configuration?
Thank you Olaf At 01.21 25/08/2002, you wrote: >Is Gnome 2 slower than Gnome 1.4? On my box both Gnome and KDE are slow, >I'd like not to stress my machine even more actually I'm using WindowMaker >and Nautilus as file manager). > >What about KDE 3 compared to kde 2? > >Thanks > >Olaf ********************************** Configuration: Celeron 400 chipset sis620, 224 MB ram cas2, 40 GB HD IBM GXP 60, integrated audio CMI 8738, integrated ethernet davicom901A, PCI CL 5446 video card 4MB (plus the sis 620 integrated in the chipset, able to use only shared memory, actually disabled), LG 8080B CD-RW, no CDROM. hda1 NTFS 8 GB W2K, hda5 XFS for / 4GB, hda3 swap 392MB, hda7 ReiserFS for /home 16 GB, still 10 GB unpartitionated. Mandrake 8.2 download edition.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
