On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:41, Franki wrote:

> >So it will just make linux look bad... (remember when M$ made it so
> Netscape
> >would crash windows just to make IE look good?)
> >
> >rgds
> >
> >frank
> 
> Pls tell me you are kidding?
> 
> I mean really... did that happen?  I was going ot reply offlist but said
> "naaaaaaaaaaaaaah"
> ---
> Femme

Yes, it is true. And Microsoft didn't "intend" on Netscape crashing - it
was more along the lines of updating code that caused the engine that
drove Netscape to crash in the vdm. There were a few ways around that
problem, but it was there for a short while. Why do you think that
Microsoft has been so DEFENSIVE about what's on the desktop? They're
keen to have programs on the desktop that are within THEIR grip - be it
browser or otherwise.

Nowadays, people are more keen about it, and they're having to slack off
of being so "proprietary", but that's what's their downfall.

-- 
Tue Nov 12 22:25:00 EST 2002

--------------------------------
|            __    __          |
|           /  \ /| |'-.       |
|          .\__/ || |   |      |
|       _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'      |
|      | /  \__.`=._) (_       |kuhn media australia
|      |/ ._/  |"""""""""|     |http://kma.0catch.com
|      |'.  `\ |         |     |stephen kuhn
|      ;"""/ / |         |     |email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  smk  ) /_/| |.-------.|     |mobile: 0410-728-389
|      '  `-`' "         "     |linux user:267497
--------------------------------

Your parity check is overdrawn and you're out of cache.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to