Thank you all.  W2K definitely seems to demand /dev/hda1.  Here's what I'm 
trying to do:
I have a laptop, supplied by my company, w/ W2K installed in a single 
partition on the "first" harddrive.  I also have a second harddrive on which 
I have shown that I can install LM9 and use Samba to connect to my company 
network and be productive (vs W2K where I wait for everything).  I can swap 
the two drives and place either in the first or second position.  Since there 
are some things for which I must continue to use W2K, but I don't want to 
muck with the company drive (or its MBR), I'd like to setup my own drive w/ 
Lilo in the MBR allowing me the option of booting to LM9 or W2K.  I don't 
have access to W2K install disks.
Can I create a small windows partition on the new /dev/hda1 and make a copy of 
bboot.ini, ntdetect.com and ntldr there?  Do I need to modify boot.ini?  How 
should I do so or where can I go for info?  (I can handle the LM 
installation.)
TIA
Paul



On Friday 17 January 2003 03:05 pm, _nasturtium wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:51 pm, civileme wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 January 2003 06:04 am, Paul Kaplan wrote:
> > > What is the correct lilo.conf entry for Windows2K on a second hard disk
> > > (/dev/hdc)?  W2K is the only OS on that disk and there is only one
> > > partition on that disk.
> >
> > AFAIK there is NO correct entry for that situation.  I don't believe the
> > win2K bootloader will handle that.
>
> Yes and no (see below).
>
> > Your LILO entry is correct if win2K would actually boot from other than
> > the first IDE device.  Frankly, as I remember I was flagged by the
> > windows installer when a customer asked for that setup and it told me
> > Windows had to be (at least partially) on the first disk, so the
> > installation is a good
>
> AFAIK you're correct, the first hard disk needs to have ntdetect.com, ntldr
> and a boot.ini installed for windows 2000 to boot. However, once those
> files are there you can boot from any hard disk. A typical boot.ini entry
> might be: multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINNT.0="Microsoft Windows
> 2000 Professional -NT5" /fastdetect
>
> Of course NT setup would create the appropriate settings; you might for
> example have Windows98 or even DOS installed, Command Console et al.
> So win2k can only boot from the first device, but can be mainly installed
> elsewhere...
>
> > question...  Did you install windows in that position?  I remember
> > installing windows on other than /dev/hda in an IDE setup, but that was
> > with /dev/hda known to the BIOS as an LS120, and in that case linux and
> > windows booted off of /dev/hdc which was the first genuine hard drive.
> >
> > Civileme
> >
> > People "curse and fix it" according to one vehement linux critic.
>
> I hope you're not talking about me =P
>
> Regards,
>       _nasturtium


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to