On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:12 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote: > On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:06 pm, Chuck Burns wrote: > > Well.. for starters, P4's have MUCH better thermal resistance, not to > > mention a thermal diode that can regulate the core CPU temperature if the > > fan happens to fail, or if the heatsink happens to fall off.. Many 3rd > > party tests have shown that a P4 cpu can run even without a heatsink, > > with no damage to the CPU at all. It slows down if it detects > > temperature overload, and prevents the core temp. from reaching critical > > levels.. (Not to mention the 400-533mhz cache speeds, compared to > > athlon's measly 200mhz.. :p) > > Thats interesting. I always thought that AMDs' chips were better performers > at the same speed range....from what I've read. (but I'm no expert). depends on how you define "performer"
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
