On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:38 am, Gregory K. Meyer, CPA wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2003 11:24 am, Russ wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I understand that the swap partition should be about twice that of your
> > physical ram. I have 256megs and when I allow MD to partition itself,
> > that is the size of the swap partition it makes. Shouldn't it be 512?
> >
> > I seem to remember (from previous tries in the past) that there was an
> > issue of Linux not reading all the ram. There was a file that the person
> > was directed to and told to edit it to what his ram was. Does anyone out
> > there know what I am talking about?
>
> The rule I follow is
>
> 2x RAM when physical RAM is 128MB or less;
> 1x RAM when physical RAM is 256MB but greater than 128;
> never a bigger swap than 256MB
>
> In monitoring, I have never had my swap usage get above 80MB when my
> physical RAM was 256MB.  When I increased physical RAM to 512MB, I never
> use the swapfile at all, and I run a lot of stuff at the same time.
>
> Once you get past 256MB, you really don't put enough stuff in memory to
> require a swap file at all (for desktop use anyway).

I forgot to answer your question.  That issue used to occur with older 
hardware.  The kernel needs to be booted with a mem= parameter to tell it how 
much memory existed.  You added it to the append line in /etc/lilo.conf.

I doubt that is your problem though, see my prior e-mail.  But if you want to 
check type

cat /proc/meminfo

which will output info about your memory to the screen.  You can check to see 
how much memory the kernel thinks you have.
-- 
Greg

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to