On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:30:10PM +0000, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Monday 24 Feb 2003 1:43 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:41:29PM +0000, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
> > >
> > > If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as
> > > a png come out at 2.4MB?
> > >
> > > Anne
> >
> > As a general rule of thumb, .jpg for photos, .png for computer-generated
> > graphics/images. As somebody else pointed out, .pngs are superior to
> > .jpgs for screenshots. And use .pngs to replace .gifs, typically for
> > web graphics (buttons, banners etc.).
> >
> > Regarding your query, lossless means bigger files.
> >
> > Todd
> 
> I had thought that it could only record what the jpg was already giving it, so 
> had expected the compression to come out at a similar size.  As an experiment 
> I took a jpg that had been saved as a png, then saved it again as a bmp.  I 
> had thought 2.7 MB was bit, but the bmp came out at 5.5 MB, so I guess png is 
> doing quite a good job of compression where data preservation is important.
> 
> Anne

I like .tif for compatibility. That would probably rival .bmp for size.

Todd

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to