On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 15:29, Guy Rouillier wrote:

> > I run both and Win2k as well. Win2K is the best Windows, IMHO.
> 
> I absolutely concur.  I have XP courtesy of an MSDN subscription (which
> I am seriously considering to let lapse) and I've never installed it.
> >From what I can see, it is just window dressing.  No new functionality,
> but a lot of frills which slow down the interface.
> 

I have to disagree with that - XP does have quite a bit of "new"
functionality built into it - and, IMHO, does have better performance
overall than Win2k. NOT THAT I'M TOUTING M$ WINDOWSXP, y'all - but being
that I have to service/support/install/configure it constantly, this is
what I deal with.

XP DOES have quite a bit of eye-candy, but overall, it can be made to
fly IF one prepares the installation properly and IF one configures the
system from the get-go. Stability and performance can outdo Win2k - but
as stated, it's a matter of tuning, tweaking and thinking.

Still, though, I run linux on my personal stuff - safer overall, far
more stable, far more secure, far less intrusive.

-- 
Tue,  4 Mar 2003 07:55:00 +1100
  7:55am  up 10:48,  2 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.14, 0.16
------------------------------------------------------------------
|            __    __          | kuhn media australia            |
|           / ,, /| |'-.       | http://kma.0catch.com           |
|          .\__/ || |   |      |=================================|
|       _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'      | stephen kuhn                    |
|      | /  \__.`=._) (_       |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|      |/ ._/  |"""""""""|     |  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    |
|      |'.  `\ |         |     |    icq: 5483808                 |
|      ;"""/ / |         |     |                                 |
|  smk  ) /_/| |.-------.|     | mobile: 0410-728-389            |
|      '  `-`' "         "     | Berkeley, New South Wales, AU   |
------------------------------------------------------------------
 linux user:267497 * RH 8.0 * PC/Mac/Linux/Networking/Consulting
------------------------------------------------------------------

Most EULA's are not legal contracts. In civilised countries the right to
disassemble is enshrined in law (ironically it comes in Europe from trying  
to keep car manufacturers from running monopolistic scams not from the
software people doing the same)

In the USA its a lot less clear. You can find laws explicitly claiming both,
and since US law is primarily about who has loads of money, its a bit
irrelevant

        - Alan Cox explaining EULA's on linux-kernel

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to