I got one of these this morning. It's sad to see my Web site's name used in such
a destructive manner. I guess it gives a new, more literal meaning to the term
'viral marketing' :(


On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:53:06 -0500, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone else gotten an email today with the subject:
> 
> Re: [newbie] OT - PCLO offline because of SCO!
> 
> It has an attachment titled Address-denon021122.WAB.scr which is 70.5k, the 
> entire message is 96.8k.  Looks like one of the rapidly spreading new 
> virus's.  Second suspicious mail I've gotten today.  This didn't come in 
> through the list however as you can see by the headers.  Good thing Linux is 
> immune to these things.  
> 
> 
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from smtp1.cwidc.net ([154.33.63.111])
>       by eagle (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 19o5032123NZFji0
>       Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from [219.52.168.63] (helo=ccc170)
>       by smtp1.cwidc.net with smtp (Exim 3.20 #4)
>       id 19O4zk-0005Ux-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:22:12 +0900
> From:  Damian Gatabria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:  Re: [newbie] OT - PCLO offline because of SCO!
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>   boundary="----------YXMI19LKW1DBEQY"
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:22:12 +0900
> X-Status: N
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Regards
>   Chris
>   Registered Linux user #283774 @ http://counter.li.org
>   Mandrake Linux 9.0
>   7:43pm  up 14 days, 23:45,  3 users,  load average: 0.73, 0.18, 0.06
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan  [Yama | http://www.pclinuxonline.com/]
  {PGP/GnuPG: http://dhanapalan.com/yama.asc
   049D38B4 | A7A9 8A02 78CB AB1B FCE4 EEC6 2DD9 249B 049D 38B4}

"As history shows a lot of ActiveX components are buggy and new version is
released. The interesting part is the buggy version is still really signed and
available in one form or another."
  -- Georgi Guninski, security expert, http://www.guninski.com, 2002-02-14

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to