On Thursday 29 May 2003 07:37 am, Technoslick wrote:There will be a secret agreement in writing before any such enterprize that could potentially cripple a company would be entered into, and this would encompass advanced payments to fund the suit, and should the principle antagonist want out it would mean paying for court defined compensation to hurt parties. No one in the right mind would act alone in this fashion against such a behemoth , and what is more you can be sure the antagonist is fully aware of the situation. It also is a measure of the fear felt by that antaginist that it is willingto go to such lengths, but it ought to also ring alarm bells all over the government bodies that oversee monoplistic trading environments in America.It is against such trade practises that they are set up to deal with. This situation rings bells in my mind to the oil major that was broken up in the last great depressionary period when the seven sisters were created out of the single oil major. It also rings true of the breakup of the telephone monopolies.
On Thursday 29 May 2003 12:07 am, Miark graced me with:
IBM, Novell, now Linus...I'm very impressed with Novell's response, here. They're calling SCO's bluff and holding their feet to the fire to either prove their moronic claims or "recant"!
High marks for Messman on this one.
Miark
I've never seen a rabid animal before, but if I had, I think it would act just like SCO is right now.
How many different ways can you commit commercial suicide? SCO's rewriting the HOW-TO on it.
T
Are they committing commercial suicide or is that just the way it appears when mocro$oft uses another company as a pawn? It would be interisting to hear the conversations going on between closed doors the last month but I suppose that we can only guess.
Marc
KM5KW
John
--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
