Something else you might want to consider its possible that this has been planned years ago..
SCO could have done it themselves, slowly, patch by patch.. not directly of course... they may have had this planed with microsnot long ago. rgds Franki -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ronald J. Hall Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] ARTICLE: The SCO UNIX Lawsuit (from Windows & .NET M agazine) On Wednesday 11 June 2003 09:35 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There are two quetions here: > whether Laura Dido is right, and huge sections of code have indeed > been lifted > whether this is relevant legally, considering the amount taken, its > significance, and whether the code has already becomd public > through the Berkely lawsuit. > > -- hendrik Something else, that Jon "Maddog" Hall of Linux International brought up: How do we know that the code was not copied by IBM (or whomever) into Linux but by SCO into their version? See, it goes both ways. -- /\ Dark< >Lord \/
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
