On Saturday 14 Jun 2003 1:06 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 13 Jun 2003 10:49 pm, Jan Wilson wrote:
> > I just right-clicked on my desktop, selected Create New --> Link to
> > Location, typed in a name (I picked Testing) and browsed to a
> > folder in /mnt.  It left a dumb page-looking logo on my desktop.  I
> > right-clicked on it, clicked on the icon in the dialog box, and
> > selected a better icon image.  It worked easily.
>
> Yes - I had done that before, but it appears to be a hard link, not a
> soft one, which is why I started again with ln -s.

I'm suprised. /mnt is usually a different partition to /home, so hard links 
would be impossible.

> What really foxed me, was that the symbolic link I had made to
> /Graphics created a desktop icon owned by me, whereas the same
> command to link to /mnt/OldHome created one owned by root.  The only
> difference I can see is that /Graphics is a vfat partition, whereas
> /mnt/OldHome is owned by root.  Is that the reason that the link is
> also owned by root?

Yes. Links inherit the ownership of the file they link to, otherwise it's a 
security hole.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to