> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] NEW EMAIL LIST INSTRUCTIONS
>
>
> Didn't have a chance to start filter yet.
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:00:44PM -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 13:47, JoeHill wrote:
> > > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:57:14 +0800
> > > "Frankie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I am sure my girlfriend would have been in agreeance
> with you had she
> > > > been bashed and gang raped by 5 men...
> > >
> > > Ok, so *you* with *one* gun would have prevented that?
> Really? Did you
> > > know that statistically it would be more likely they
> would take the gun
> > > away from you and use it against you? Thought not.
> >
> > Ever read a book? Thought not. You're a spout for liberal lies and
> > bullshit, a mushroom in a black room, reiterating what you
> hear without
> > any literary verification. Not that this will do any good
> for somebody
> > like you, but here:
>
> Literary: adj. Of, relating to, or dealing with literature
>
> Literature: n. 1. The body of written works of a language,
> period, or
> culture. 2. Imaginative or creative writing, especially of recognized
> artistic value: "Literature must be an analysis of experience
> and a synthesis
> of the findings into a unity" (Rebecca West). 3. The art or
> occupation of a
> literary writer. 4. The body of written work produced by scholars or
> researchers in a given field: medical literature.
>
> There is scientific literature or research in given fields,
> but I don't
> think you really want to say "literary verification" here as literary
> conveys more a sense of "imaginative" or "creative" as in a work of
> *fiction*, which only lends more humor to your rantings.
>
> I have never seen such inappropriate language in an off-topic post, so
> I'll address you as you see fit to address others.
>
> Get a clue you stupid fuck.
>
> >
> > The Death of Right and Wrong: Exposing the Left's Assault
> on Our Culture
> > and Values by Tammy Bruce
> > ISBN: 0761516638
> >
> > The Bias Against Guns: Why Almost Everything You've Heard About Gun
> > Control Is Wrong by John R., Jr. Lott
> > ISBN: 0895261146
> >
> > The Seven Myths of Gun Control: Reclaiming the Truth About
> Guns, Crime,
> > and the Second Amendment by Richard Poe, David Horowitz
> > ISBN: 0761525580
> >
> > More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun-Control
> Laws (Studies
> > in Law and Economics (Chicago, Ill.) by John R., Jr. Lott
> > ISBN: 0226493644
>
> Yes, I'll be sure to rush right out and get these books. They
> really do
> look like unbiased treatments of this important issue! This
> is the thing
> that annoys me about you fascists, you drink your own propoganda and
> hurl insults at those who would dare to question it. Somebody who
> disagrees is stupid--he or she hasn't read your approved "literature";
> you label anybody who is against you a traitor. In trying to fight for
> what you think is "the American way," you would send us back
> to a time
> before the Bill of Rights.
>
> I'm not talking about guns here. I'm talking about the way
> you choose to
> communicate. It's people like you who give gun rights advocates a bad
> name. You haven't the first fucking clue about civil discourse.
>
Unfortunately, my idea of gun control is hitting what I aim at! ;)
I grew up with guns. My dad taught me how to hunt, three simple
rules that I have never forgotten:
1.) Don't aim at something, unless you intend to shoot it.
2.) Don't shoot anything, unless you intend to kill it.
3.) Don't kill anything, unless you intend to eat it.
I learned those when I was 6. I wish more people would teach the children
such rules. ;)
Jonathan G. Shilling
Senior LAN Administrator
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
